Why Isn’t The Gov’t Giving Us A Stimulus Package That Stimulates?

29 01 2009

Even before Drudge reported $335Mil for STD prevention and $5Bil for the organization known as ACORN that honest, Obama has nothing to do with, Anti-Strib posted:

There’s $1 billion for Amtrak, the federal railroad that hasn’t turned a profit in 40 years; $2 billion for child-care subsidies; $50 million for that great engine of job creation, the National Endowment for the Arts; $400 million for global-warming research and another $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects. There’s even $650 million on top of the billions already doled out to pay for digital TV conversion coupons.

In selling the plan, President Obama has said this bill will make “dramatic investments to revive our flagging economy.” Well, you be the judge. Some $30 billion, or less than 5% of the spending in the bill, is for fixing bridges or other highway projects. There’s another $40 billion for broadband and electric grid development, airports and clean water projects that are arguably worthwhile priorities.

Add the roughly $20 billion for business tax cuts, and by our estimate only $90 billion out of $825 billion, or about 12 cents of every $1, is for something that can plausibly be considered a growth stimulus. And even many of these projects aren’t likely to help the economy immediately. As Peter Orszag, the President’s new budget director, told Congress a year ago, “even those [public works] that are ‘on the shelf’ generally cannot be undertaken quickly enough to provide timely stimulus to the economy.”

Most of the rest of this project spending will go to such things as renewable energy funding ($8 billion) or mass transit ($6 billion) that have a low or negative return on investment. Most urban transit systems are so badly managed that their fares cover less than half of their costs. However, the people who operate these systems belong to public-employee unions that are campaign contributors to . . . guess which party?

Here’s another lulu: Congress wants to spend $600 million more for the federal government to buy new cars. Uncle Sam already spends $3 billion a year on its fleet of 600,000 vehicles. Congress also wants to spend $7 billion for modernizing federal buildings and facilities. The Smithsonian is targeted to receive $150 million; we love the Smithsonian, too, but this is a job creator?

So why all the PORK?  The insanely smart Thomas Sowell posits,

One important clue may be a recent statement by President Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, that “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.”

Again, lots of folks think Bush “cherry-picked” evidence and trumped up the “War on terror” for personal reasons.  Will anyone in the corporate media suggest the same for the Dems and Obama?

Advertisements




Cherry-Picking Evidence Of The Financial Crisis

25 11 2008

We’ve all heard about Bush “cherry-picking” evidence so he could attack Iraq, be called a lying war-monger, and ultimately obliterate his own legacy.  I’d be thrilled to see the mainstream press publish some articles on politicians who are a little too excited to impose socialist stimulus plans.  I know.  Fat chance.

Is it wrong to think Obama, given his Alinsky training of “rubbing raw resentments of the people,” isn’t exactly devastated at the current state of economic collapse?  Come to think of it, is there a politician who could be more thrilled with the opportunity it provides?

Ok, so trying to be fair…If Bush was excited about 9/11 because he could line the pockets of his military-industrial buddies, and smash Hussein (Saddam) in the face.  Then what is Obama excited about?