Great News! Tabloids Discover Obama Birth Certificate Flap

19 12 2008

I guess it really is for kooks.

In any event, think of how many grandmothers are going to suddenly regret their votes!


hat tip: who else but Atlas

Advertisements

Actions

Information

3 responses

19 12 2008
Ted

DONOFRIO/WROTNOWSKI IS NOT DEAD — IT IS AIRTIGHT – THE SUPREMES KNOW IT BUT ARE AFRAID TO ACT — SO THE EXECUTIVE AND/OR THE PEOPLE WILL DO SO — EASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED — HERE’S HOW (READ CAREFULLY):–

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

22 12 2008
GOPster

That SCOTUS is dragging their heels on an obvious Constitutional issue is amazing.

One would think these Justices would be drooling over the opportunity to hear and discuss this issue as (I believe) it has never come up before. How much does anyone want to bet that if this does go before the Supreme Court, and they make a ruling in favor of Obama that it will magically appear all over the mainstream media? Of course, more delicious is the specter of a negative ruling, the MSM HAVING to report on it, and having to explain why they weren’t following the story in the first place. As far as the Supreme Court, I can only come up with two reasons they haven’t already heard the case:

1. The Supreme Court considers it to be more of a legislative matter than a judicial one…don’t want to step on toes or something.

2. The wording of the lawsuit wasn’t up to par so that the Supreme Court could, in good conscience, hear the case.

Also amazing is all those out there (including one my state senators I wrote to about this) is that somehow the People at large, i.e., the electorate somehow ‘vetted’ Barack Hussein Obama on this matter, though it was not reported and the actual birth certificate has never been viewed by anyone with any certainty.

31 12 2008
Jason Campbell

“The Supreme Court has thrown this malarke out the door” …
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a505.htm DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
…so the “malarke” has NOT been thrown out the door … YET.
Everyone I see states that Obama HAS submitted the “proper form of certification to become the next President” however posting the documentation to a website does not constitute proper delivery of documentation. They say the document that was posted has been verified by the Hawaiian authorities but I’ve read the article many times and have never seen that they said he was born in Hawaii just that the form (certification and not certificate) they sent was authentic. The form was a certification (does not offer substantial proof of where he was born)and not a certificate (does offer the proof needed to establish he is a “natural born citizen)which are totally different forms. I’ve seen it stated that this form is adequate for identification for becoming the next President. The question then is if he didn’t have this documentation and had to have it resent then how did he show proper forms for identification as proof that he was eligible for the Presidency to begin with. People have also stated that because he was Senator this “proves” he must have showed his documentation then but one does not need to prove being a “natural citizen” to become a Senator (being a natural citizen is not required to be a Senator but IS to be President)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: